So today I ran across the following citation while following Tom Lehrer’s advice on success in mathematics:
N. I. Fuss, Solutio quæstionis, quot modis polygonum n laterum in polygona m laterum, per diagonales resolvi quæat. Nova Acta Academis Sci. Petropolitans 9 (1791), pp. 243–251.
Looking around further, I found a cluster of papers all with precisely the same citation. Ack. I hate it when this happens: a certain reference gets copied over and over and probably no one has ever looked it up; they just cite it because everyone else is citing it.
Well, I wanted to find the paper to discover whether people were just citing it so they could look all cool and stuff, citing something in Latin from the 18th century, or whether they were citing it because the paper was relevant and interesting. Unfortunately, the major math article indices only have articles from about 1810 or so, but perhaps I could find a library that has microfilm or something and get a paper copy made for me. I go about searching.
Nothing comes up. I search for the author—whose name is a common English word—and can’t get anywhere, although I can find out who he was easily enough. No results for the journal, which is strange, because I quickly realized that Euler published most of his work in that journal. When you cannot find the journal in which the most prolific mathematician ever published most of his work, something is fishy.
Finally I started searching for information on the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences (which is what I puzzled out from “Academis Sci. Petropolitans”) and, working backwards to journals published by that organizations, found this page from the Euler archive and learned that some doofus screwed up the Latin: the journal’s title is Nova Acta Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae. I’ve forgotten nearly everything from my year of Latin in high school, but I do remember that noun declension is terribly important and you can’t just go around changing “ae” into “is”.
It’s like genetic mutation. Some bit of transcriptase comes to work hungover, copies some DNA incorrectly, but then afterwards the newly-mutated DNA gets copied—and if the change is relatively harmless (like massively misspelling the journal’s title), it sticks around. Well, I’m going to find a way to cite this article correctly and include a snippy little note about all the other incorrect citations.
Anyway, armed with the correct name of the journal, I quickly find not just a copy of the table of contents for that volume but the entire volume itself! Screw getting a microfilm copy from some library—here’s the actual article available from Google Books, via the New York Public Library!
(BTW, check out Euler in the table of contents —his articles in that issue take up pages 3 to 165.)